top of page


I wanted to go to bed but was made to watch the end of the Harry interview on Sunday night.

It was so complex to analyse, without seeing it many times and reading the transcript, and probably depends on your affiliations.

What I did get was his extreme dislike for, and fixation with, the Press. This seemed to be underlying and taint his whole outlook upon life, the world and sadly his extended family. He played the victim who was protecting his wife and children. That's a good quality but stop there. He should not expect support for attacking a National Institution, the Royal Family, and boasting about how naughty he had been. He seeks forgiveness for the mistakes he made but gives little himself.

I think what also makes it difficult to reconcile is the fact that he, and Megan, are making millions of dollars from their media 'blockbuster' exposures.

I can't say I'm on his side, apart from my feeling that the Press needs to be monitored and made accountable for the misinformation they publish as truth.


3 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Just turned on the TV and FA WSL Arsenal v Chelsea was showing. It was half-time and three ladies were analysing the first half. Fair enough. Same on another channel showing Netball. That's fine and

So now it is reported, page 4, The Sun, Saturday 9th December, 2023, that he admits to naming the two Royals who speculated/questioned Archie's skin colour. Whatelse has he been lying about? Can we

For a few years I received free eye examinations because of an history of Glaucoma in my family. Then, a couple of years ago, at a routine eye session the optician recommended I had further tests to g

bottom of page